Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2010, 11 (2): 3-15

Representing Masculine Generics: A Theoretical Integration of Empirical Findings

Lisa Irmen, Ute Linner

The paper aims to integrate the results of several studies on the representation of masculine generics in German into a theoretical framework. Although the results are consistent in showing the male bias of masculine generics, they are based on different experimental procedures and stimulus variations, and that makes the cognitive processes involved hard to compare. Assuming that reading results in the construction of situation models and that gender‑related memory content is activated through a fast, undirected resonance process it is possible to determine a common cognitive basis. Possible causes of gender ‑related resonance are identified and their influence on situation models is discussed. The theoretical base allows the formulation of general statements on how gender‑related information influences language processing. Furthermore, it has practical implications for how to implement a gender‑fair language.

Keywords: mental representation, grammatical gender, masculine generics

Published: June 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Irmen, Lisa and Ute Linner. 2010. "Representing Masculine Generics: A Theoretical Integration of Empirical Findings." Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research 11(2):3-15.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Barton, S. B., Sanford, A. J. 1993. "A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment." Memory & Cognition, Vol. 21: 477-487. Go to original source...
    2. Braun, F., Gottburgsen, A., Sczesny, S., Stahlberg, D. 1998. "Können Geophysiker Frauen sein? Generische Personenbezeichnungen im Deutschen." Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, Vol. 26: 265-283. Go to original source...
    3. Cameron, D. 1985. "What has gender got tu do with sex?" Language & Communication, Vol. 5: 19-27. Go to original source...
    4. Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., O'Brian, E. J. 1998. "What is readily available during reading? A memory-based view of text processing." Discourse Processes, Vol. 26: 109-129. Go to original source...
    5. Duden Grammatik (Duden sv. 4), 1998. 6. nově přepracované vydání. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
    6. Duffy, S. A., Keir, J. A. 2004. "Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge." Memory & Cognition, Vol. 32: 551-559. Go to original source...
    7. Engel, U. 1998. Deutsche Gramatik. Heidelberg: Groos.
    8. Gabriel, U., Mellenberger, F. 2004. "Exchanging the generic masculine for gender-balanced formel - the impact of context valence." Swiss Journal of Psychology, Vol. 63: 273-278. Go to original source...
    9. Garnham, A. 2001. Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove: Psychology Press.
    10. Garrod, S. C. 1995. "Distinguishing between explicit and implicit focus during text comprehension." Pp. 3-17 in Rickheit, G., Habel, C. (eds.). Focus and coherence in text comprehension. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    11. Garrod, S. C., Sanford A. J. 1988. "Discourse models as interfaces between language and the spatial world." Journal of Semantics, Vol. 6: 147-160. Go to original source...
    12. Gerrig, R. J., McKoon, G. 1998. "The readiness is all: The functionality of memory-based text processing." Discourse Processes, Vol. 26: 67-86. Go to original source...
    13. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K., Zwaan, R. A. 1997. "Discourse Comprehension." Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 48: 163-189. Go to original source...
    14. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., Trabasso, T. 1994. "Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension." Psychological Review, Vol. 101: 371-395. Go to original source...
    15. Heise, E. 2000. "Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinum und seiner Alternativen." Sprache & Kognition, Vol. 19: 3-13. Go to original source...
    16. Heise, E. 2003. "Auch einfühlsame Studenten sind Männer: Das generische Maskulinum und die mentale Repräsentation von Personen." Verhaltenstherapie und Psychosoziale Praxis, Vol. 35: 285-291.
    17. Hellinger, M. (ed.) 1985. Sprachwandel und feministische Sprachpolitik: Internationale Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
    18. Hellinger, M. 1990. Kontrastive feministische Linguistik: Mechanismen sprachlicher Diskriminierung im Englischen und Deutschen. Ismaning: Max Hueber Verlag.
    19. Irmen, L., Köhncke, A. 1996. "Zur Psychologie des "generischen" Maskulinums." Sprache & Kognition, Vol. 15: 152-166.
    20. Irmen, L., Roßberg, N. 2004. "Gender markedness of language: The impact of grammatical and non-linguistic information on the mental representation of person information." Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 23: 272-307. Go to original source...
    21. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1982. "Propositional representations, procedural semantics, and mental models." Pp. 253-261 in Mehler, J., Walker, E. C. T., Garrett, M. (eds.). Perspectives on mental representation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    22. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1987. "The comprehension of discourse and mental models." Pp. 253-261 in Nagao, M. (ed.). Language and artificial inteligence. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
    23. Kalverkämper, H. 1979. "Die Frauen und die Sprache." Linguistische Berichte, Vol. 62: 55-71.
    24. Kintsch, W. 1988. "The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model." Psychological Review, Vol. 95: 163-182. Go to original source...
    25. Kintsch, W., van Dijk, T. A. 1978. "Toward a model of text comprehension and production." Psychological Review, Vol. 85: 363-394. Go to original source...
    26. Linderholm, T., Virtue, S., Tzeng, Y. van den Broek, P. 2004. "Fluctuations in the availability of information during reading: Capturing cognitive processes using the landscape model." Discourse Processes, Vol. 37: 165-186. Go to original source...
    27. McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R. 1986. "Inferences about predictable events." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 12: 82-91. Go to original source...
    28. McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R. 1992. "Inference dutiny reading." Psychological Review, Vol. 99: 440-466. Go to original source...
    29. O'Brien, E. L., Cook, A. E., Peracchi, K. A. 2004. "Updating a situation models: Reply to Zwaan and Madden." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 30: 289-291. Go to original source...
    30. O'Brien, E. L., Rizella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., Halleran, J. G. 1998. "Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 24: 1200-1210. Go to original source...
    31. Pusch, L. F. 1979. "Der Mensch ist ein Gewohnheitstier, doch weiter kommt man ohne ihr." Linguistische Berichte, Vol. 63: 84-102.
    32. Pusch, L. F. 1984. "Weibliche Personenbezeichnungen als Ausdruck weiblicher Realitätsdefinition." Pp. 257-273 in Kürschner, W., Vogt, R. (eds.). Sprachtheorie, Pragmatik, Interdisziplinäres. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Go to original source...
    33. Rothermund, K. 1998. "Automatische geschlechtspezifische Assoziationen beim Lesen von Texten mit geschlechtseindeutigen und generisch maskulinen Text-Subjekten." Sprache & Kognition, Vol. 17: 183-198.
    34. Rothmund, J., Scheele, B. 2004. "Personenbezeichnungsmodelle auf dem Prüfstand." Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 212: 40-54. Go to original source...
    35. Rummler, U. 1995. "Ärztin oder Arzt? Eine psycholinguistische Untersuchung zum generischen Gebrauch des Maskulinums bei Grundschülerinnen und Grundschülern." Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie, Vol. 51: 173-189.
    36. Sanford, A. J., Barton, S. B., Moxey, L. M., Paterson, K. 1995. "Cohesion processes, coherence, and anomaly detection." Pp. 203-213 in Rickheit, G., Habel, C. (eds.). Focus and coherence in discourse processing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    37. Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C. 1981. Unterstanding written language. Chichester: Wiley.
    38. Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C. 1998. "The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension." Discourse Processes, Vol. 26: 159-190. Go to original source...
    39. Sanford, A. J., Moxey, L. M. 1995. Notes on plural reference and the scenario-mapping principle in comprehension. Pp. 18-34 in Rickheit, G., Habel, C. (eds.). Focus and coherence in discourse comprehension. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    40. Sanford, A. J., Moxey, L. M. 1999. "What are mental models made of?" Pp. 57-76 in Rickheit, G., Habel, C. (eds.). Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Go to original source...
    41. Scheele, B., Gauler, E. 1993. "Wählen Wissenschaftler ihre Probleme anders aus als WissenschaftlerInnen? Das Genus-Sexus-Problem als paradigmatischer Fall der linguistischen Relativitätsthese." Sprache & Kognition, Vol. 12: 59-72.
    42. Scheele, B., Rothmund, J. 2001. "Sprache als Sozialität: Linguistische Relativität und das Genus -Sexus-Problem." Pp. 77-129 in Groeben, N. (ed.). Zur Programmatik einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Münster: Aschendorf.
    43. Stahlberg, D., Sczesny, S. 2001. "Efekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen." Psychologische Rundschau, Vol. 52: 131-140. Go to original source...
    44. Trömel-Plötz, S. 1978. "Lingvistik und Frauensprache." Linguistische Berichte, Vol. 57: 59-68.
    45. van den Broek, P., Gustafson, M. 1999. "Comprehension and memory for texts: Three generations of reading research." Pp. 15-34 in Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., van den Broek, P. (eds.). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence. Essays of honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    46. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., Thurlow, R. 1996. "A "landscape" view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation." Pp. 165-187 in Britton, B. K., Graesser, A. C. (eds.). Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    47. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., Linderholm, T. 1999. "The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation." Pp. 71-98 in van Oostendorp, H., Goldman, S. R. (eds.). The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    48. van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategie of discourse comprehension. New York: Academia Press.
    49. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A. 1998. "Situation models in language comprehension and memory." Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 123: 162-185. Go to original source...
    50. Korespondenci zasílejte na adresu: lisa.irmen@psychologie. uni-heidelberg.de.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content