Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2023, 24 (1): 159-184 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2023.011

Pills, Power and Performativity: Negotiating Masculinity in the Emergence of Male Contraceptive Technology

Eleonore Lorijn
The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

As we prepare for a new contraceptive revolution centering the male reproductive body, little is known about 21st century men’s interest in pursuing hormonal technology. This paper sets out to understand what male hormonal contraception (MHC) means for the performance of masculinity. Specifically, I seek to understand how contraceptive technology might contribute to the emergence and transformation of different masculine identities, and whether these identities will function to enhance or denounce the technology’s cultural feasibility and widespread assimilation. Amid the heavily quantitative nature of literature on this topic, I conduct semi-structured interviews to form a more intimate understanding of this relationship. Through thematic analysis, this project reveals a typology of three analytic figures which surface in response to the future existence of MHC: the ‘responsible, caring man’, the ‘lazy man’, and the ‘independent, heterosexual man’. The ways in which these identities conflict, complement, and interact with each other indicate how masculinities are being negotiated upon a shifting contraceptive landscape. The conclusions derived from my analyses are twofold: Firstly, that the cultural feasibility of MHC in western contexts will simultaneously demand and induce a destabilisation of conventionalised gender performances. Secondly, that the masculinities which emerge from this new frontier of contraception are complex, multiple and fluid. The investigation ends by looking at the wider implications of my findings for policy and practice. Keywords: Contraceptive technology, masculine identities, gender performativity

Keywords: Contraceptive technology, masculine identities, gender performativity

Received: June 21, 2022; Revised: July 20, 2023; Accepted: July 21, 2023; Published: September 6, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lorijn, Eleonore. 2023. "Pills, Power and Performativity: Negotiating Masculinity in the Emergence of Male Contraceptive Technology." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 24(1):159-184.
Download citation

References

  1. Arxer, S. 2011. Hybrid Masculine Power. Humanity & Society 35 (4): 390-422. Go to original source...
  2. Ashcraft, C. 2000. Naming Knowledge: A Language for Reconstructing Domestic Violence and Systemic Gender Inequity. Women and Language 23 (1): 3.
  3. Braun, V., V. Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77-101. Go to original source...
  4. Bridges, T., C. J. Pascoe. 2014. Hybrid Masculinities: New Directions in the Sociology of Men and Masculinities. Sociology Compass 8 (3): 246-258. Go to original source...
  5. Butler, J. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519-531. Go to original source...
  6. Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
  7. Butler, J. 1993. Critically Queer. Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 1 (1): 17-32. Go to original source...
  8. Campo-Engelstein, L. 2011. No More Larking Around! Why We Need Male LARCs. The Hastings Center Report 41 (5): 22-26. Go to original source...
  9. Cockburn, C. 1992. The Circuit of Technology: Gender, Identity and Power. Pp. 33-42 in R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch (eds.). Consuming Technology: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.
  10. Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  11. Connell, R. W., J. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society 19 (6): 829-859. Go to original source...
  12. Courtenay, W. H. 2000. Constructions of Masculinity and Their Influence on Men's Well-Being: A Theory of Gender and Health. Social Science & Medicine 50 (10): 1385-1401. Go to original source...
  13. Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-Discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Anti-Racist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1): 139-167.
  14. Dalessandro, C., L. James-Hawkins, C. Sennott. 2019. Strategic Silence: College Men and Hegemonic Masculinity in Contraceptive Decision Making. Gender & Society 33 (5): 772-794. Go to original source...
  15. Demetriou, D. 2001. Connell's Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique. Theory and Society 30 (3): 337-361. Go to original source...
  16. Dwyer, S. C., J. L. Buckle. 2009. The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1): 54-63. Go to original source...
  17. Eberhardt, J., A. van Wersch, N. Meikle. 2009. Attitudes Towards the Male Contraceptive Pill in Men and Women in Casual and Stable Sexual Relationships. Family Planning Reproductive Health Care 35 (3): 161-165. Go to original source...
  18. Edwards, R., J. Holland. 2013. What Is Qualitative Interviewing? Retrieved 16/06/2023 (https://library.oapen.org/viewer/web/viewer.html?file=/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/58752/9781849668026.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y).
  19. Galam, R. G. 2015. Gender, Reflexivity, and Positionality in Male Research in One's Own Community with Filipino Seafarers' Wives. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 16 (3). Retrieved 21/06/2023 (https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2330).
  20. Hamilton, L., E. A. Armstrong. 2009. Gendered Sexuality in Young Adulthood: Double Binds and Flawed Options. Gender & Society 23 (5): 589-616. Go to original source...
  21. Hamm, M., M. Evans, E. Miller, M. Browne, D. Bell, S. Borrero. 2019. 'It's Her Body': Low-Income Men's Perceptions of Limited Reproductive Agency. Contraception 99 (2): 111-117. Go to original source...
  22. Heinemann, K., F. Saad, M. Wiesemes, S. White, L. Heinemann. 2005. Attitudes Toward Male Fertility Control: Results of a Multinational Survey on Four Continents. Human Reproduction 20 (2): 549-556. Go to original source...
  23. Hirose, A., K. K. Pih. 2010. Men Who Strike and Men Who Submit: Hegemonic and Marginalized Masculinities in Mixed Martial Arts. Men and Masculinities 13 (2): 190-209. Go to original source...
  24. Hochschild, A. R. 2003. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Go to original source...
  25. Holloway, I., L. Todres. 2003. The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and Coherence. Qualitative Research 3 (3): 345-357. Go to original source...
  26. Holt, D., C. Thompson. 2004. Man of Action Heroes: The Pursuit of Heroic Masculinity in Everyday Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 31 (2): 425-440. Go to original source...
  27. Hughes, T. P. 1986. The Seamless Web: Technology, Science, Etcetera, Etcetera. Social Studies of Science 16 (2): 281-292. Go to original source...
  28. Johnson, B. G. 2018. The Relationship between Masculinity and Stigma: Predicting Help-Seeking Behaviors in Men. University Honors Program Theses: 376. Retrieved 21/06/2023 (https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1431&context=honors-theses).
  29. Jones, K. 2020. 'Men Too': Masculinities and Contraceptive Politics in Late Twentieth Century Britain. Contemporary British History 34 (1): 44-70. Go to original source...
  30. Kabeer, N. 2001. Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment. Pp. 17-57 in A. Sisask (ed.). Discussing Women's Empowerment: Theory and Practice. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
  31. Kimmel, M. S. 1997. Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity. Pp. 223-242 in M. M. Gergen, S. N. Davis (eds.). Toward a New Psychology of Gender. Abingdon, OXON: Routledge.
  32. Kimmel, M. S. 2003. Globalization and its Mal(e)Contents: The Gendered Moral and Political Economy of Terrorism. International Sociology 18 (3): 603-620. Go to original source...
  33. Kimmel, M. S. 2008. Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. New York: Harper Collins.
  34. Kole, E. 1999. Organising the Transfer of Electronic Network Technology to Meet the Objectives of NGOs in the South. Research Proposal. University of Amsterdam.
  35. Lacasse, K., T. E. Jackson. 2019. Conformity to Masculine Norms Predicts Us Men's Decision-Making Regarding a New Male Contraceptive. Culture, Health & Sexuality 22 (10): 1128-1144. Go to original source...
  36. Laird, J. 1994. A Male Pill? Gender Discrepancies in Contraceptive Commitment. Feminism and Psychology 4 (3): 458-469. Go to original source...
  37. Latour, B. 1991. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  38. Layte, R., H. Mcgee, A. Quail, K. Rundle, G. Cousins, C. Donnolly, F. Mulcahy, R. Conroy.2006. The Irish Study of Sexual Health & Relationships. Dublin: Crisis Pregnancy Agency and the Development of Health and Children. Go to original source...
  39. Lefkowich, M. 2019. When Women Study Men: Gendered Implications for Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 1-9. Go to original source...
  40. Lohan, M., W. Faulkner. 2004. Masculinities and Technologies: Some Introductory Remarks. Men and Masculinities 6 (4): 319-329. Go to original source...
  41. Lundgren, S. 2011. Heterosexual Havana. Ideals and Hierarchies of Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Cuba. Uppsala: Dept. of Cultural Anthropology and Ethnology, Uppsala University.
  42. Mahalik, J. R., S. M. Burns, M. Syzdek. 2007. Masculinity and Perceived Normative Health Behaviors As Predictors of Men's Health Behaviors. Soc Sci Med 64 (11): 2201-2209. Go to original source...
  43. Marsiglio, W. 1993. Adolescent Males' Orientation Toward Paternity and Contraception. Family Planning Perspectives 25 (1): 22-31. Go to original source...
  44. McCreary, D. R. 1994. The Male Role and Avoiding Femininity. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 31 (9-10): 517-531. Go to original source...
  45. Messner, M. A., M. C. Duncan, K. Jensen. 1993. Separating the Men From the Girls: the Gendered Language of Televised Sports. Gender & Society 7 (1): 121-137. Go to original source...
  46. Mollborn, S. 2017. Mixed Messages: Norms and Social Control around Teen Sex and Pregnancy. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  47. NHS.inform. Retrieved 31/08/2021 (https://www.nhsinform.scot).
  48. Odimegwu, C., C. Okemgbo. 2008. Men's Perceptions of Masculinities and Sexual Health Risks in Igboland, Nigeria. International Journal of Men's Health 7 (1): 21-39. Go to original source...
  49. Okigbo, C., I. S. Speizer, M. E. Domino, S. L. Curtis, C. T. Halpern, J. C. Fotso. 2018. Gender Norms and Modern Contraceptive Use in Urban Nigeria: A Multilevel Longitudinal Study. BMC Women's Health 18 (1): 178-190. Go to original source...
  50. Otter.ai. Retrieved 31/07/2023 (http://otter.ai).
  51. Oudshoorn, N. 2003. The Male Pill: A Biography of a Technology in the Making. Durham, London: Duke University Press. Go to original source...
  52. Oudshoorn, N. 2004. 'Astronauts in the Sperm World': The Renegotiation of Masculine Identities in Discourses on Male Contraceptives. Men and Masculinities 6 (4): 349-367. Go to original source...
  53. Peterson, L. M., M. A. T. Campbell, Z. E. Laky. 2019. The Next Frontier for Men's Contraceptive Choice: College Men's Willingness to Pursue Male Hormonal Contraception. Psychology of Men & Masculinities 20 (2): 226-237. Go to original source...
  54. Randell-Moon, H. 2012. 'I'm Nobody': The Somatechnical Construction of Bodies and Identity in Joss Whedon's Dollhouse. Feminist Media Studies 12 (2): 265-280. Go to original source...
  55. Randles, J. 2018. Making Men into 'Responsible' Fathers. Contexts 17 (2): 34-39. Go to original source...
  56. Ringheim, K. 1996. Whither Methods for Men? Emerging Gender Issues in Contraception. Reproductive Health Matter 4 (7): 79-89. Go to original source...
  57. Ryan, G. W., B. H. Russell. 2003. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 15 (1): 85-109. Go to original source...
  58. Silberschmidt, M. 2001. Disempowerment of Men in Rural and Urban East Africa: Implications for Male Identity and Sexual Behavior. World Development 29 (4): 657-671. Go to original source...
  59. Socolow, F. E. 2019. Drugs, Gender, and Profit: The Continued Absence of Male
  60. Contraceptive Methods 60 Years Beyond the Pill. Senior Capstone Projects: 932. Retrieved 21/06/2023 (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/239228013.pdf).
  61. Strauss, A., J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  62. Strong, J. 2021. Exploring the Roles of Men and Masculinities in Abortion and Emergency Contraception Pathways, Ghana: A Mobile Phone-Based Mixed-Methods Study Protocol. BMJ Open. Retrieved 21/06/2023 (https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e042649).
  63. Tillmann-Healy, L. M. 2003. Friendship as Method. Qualitative Inquiry 9 (5): 729-749. Go to original source...
  64. United Nations. 2009. World Contraception Use. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division.
  65. Van Wersch, A., J. Eberhardt, E. Stringer. 2012. Attitudes Towards the Male Contraceptive Pill: Psychosocial and Cultural Explanations for Delaying a Marketable Product. Andrologie 22 (3): 171-179. Go to original source...
  66. Wade, L. 2017. American Hookup: the New Culture of Sex on Campus. New York: Norton.
  67. Wajcman, J. 2000. Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State Is the Art? Social Studies of Science 30 (3): 447-464. Go to original source...
  68. Walker, S. 2011. Attitudes to a Male Contraceptive Pill in a Group of Contraceptive Users in the UK. Journal of Men's Health 8 (4): 267-273. Go to original source...
  69. Weinstein, S., G. Goebel. 1979. The Relationship between Contraceptive Sex Role Stereotyping and Attitudes toward Male Contraception among Males. The Journal of Sex Research 15 (3): 235-242. Go to original source...
  70. Wilson, A. D. 2018. 'Put It in Your Shoe It Will Make You Limp': British Men's Online Responses to a Male Pill. The Journal of Men's Studies 26 (3): 247-265. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.