Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2012, 13 (2): 18-27

Political difference and feminist theory

Ľubica Kobová

The paper discusses the uses of the concept of the political in both feminist political theory and mainstream postfoundational political theory, and its implications for feminist political theorizing today. In feminist theory, the concept primarily emerged as a counter-reaction to the disputed foundations of feminism, the subject of women. The political was identified with contingency and contingent foundations; however, no thorough exploration of the term was carried out within the field of feminist theorizing. The mainstream postfoundational political theory rests in identifying political difference, i.e. a difference between the ontic level of politics and its foundations on ontological level. I introduce Mouffe's notion of agonism as an exemplary normative theory of political difference. Next to it I juxtapose Jacques Rancière's approach which attempts to undermine the distinctions on which ontological political differences are based. His account of politics seems to point beyond ontologization of politics and, instead, focuses on the immanent plane of politics, in which the given, the visible can be merely recomposed. In conclusion I link his account to that of Linda Zerilli's political judgment, and argue for a feminist political philosophy and theory without the need for a purified founding concept of the political.

Published: June 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kobová, Ľubica. 2012. "Political difference and feminist theory." Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research 13(2):18-27.
Download citation

References

  1. Ackelsberg, M. 2010. "Political theory today. Who's teaching what to whom? Some reflections." PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 43, No. 2: 279-282. Go to original source...
  2. Allen, A. 2007. "Multiple feminisms. Commentary on Noëlle McAfee's 'Two Feminisms'". [online]. Symposia on Gender,Race and Philosophy,Vol. 3, No. 3: nestránkované. [cit. 3. 5. 2010]. Dostupnéz:<http://web.mit.edu/sgrp>.
  3. Allen, A. 2009. "Feminism and the subject of politics." Pp. 1-18 in De Bruin, B., Zurn, C. F. (eds.). New waves in political philosophy. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  4. Arendtová, H. 2002. Přednášky o Kantově politické filosofii. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  5. Arendtová, H. 2007. Vita activa neboli O činném životě. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  6. Barša, P., Slačálek, O., Stöckelová, T. 2010. "Od rozrtržky ke sporu." Pp. 195-212 in Barša, P et al. Kritika depolitizovaného rozumu. Úvahy (nejen) o nové normalizaci. Všeň: Grimmus.
  7. Bauer, N. 2007. "The second feminism. Commentary on Noëlle McAfee's 'Two Feminisms'." [online]. Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy, Vol. 3, No. 3: nestránkované. [cit. 3. 5. 2010]. Dostupnéz:<http://web.mit.edu/sgrp>.
  8. Brewster, B. 2005. "Glossary." Pp. 249-258 in Althusser, L. For Marx. London & New York: Verso.
  9. Butler, J. 1998. "Náhodnosť základov. Feminizmus a problém 'postmodernizmu'." Feministický kultúrny časopis ASPEKT, č. 1 - Myslenie žien: 39-47.
  10. Butler, J. 2003.Trampoty s rodom. Feminizmus a subverzia identity. Bratislava:Aspekt.
  11. Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war. When is life grievable? London & New York: Verso.
  12. Butler, J., Scott, J. W. 1992. Feminists theorize the political. New York & London: Routledge.
  13. Cawson, A. 2003. "Korporatismus." Pp. 223-226 in Miller, D. Blackwellova encyklopedie politického myšlení. Brno: Barrister & Principal.
  14. Connolly, W. E. 1993(1974). The terms of political discourse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  15. Davis, O. 2010. Jacques Rancière. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
  16. Dean, J. (ed.)1997. Feminism and the new democracy. Re-siting the political. London: Sage.
  17. Dean, J. 2008. "Feminist purism and the question of 'radicality' in contemporary political theory." Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 7, No. 3: 280-301. Go to original source...
  18. Di Stefano, C. 2000. "Feminist political philosophy." [online]. APA Newsletters. Newsletter on feminism and philosophy, Vol. 99, No. 2: nestránkované. [cit. 12. 8. 2011]. Dostupnéz: <http://www.apaonline.org/apa/publications/newsletters/v99n2/feminism/symposium-distefano.asp>.
  19. Dietz, M. G. 2003. "Current controversies in feminist theory." Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 6: 399-431. Go to original source...
  20. Fisken, T. 2010. "Agonism." P. 13 in Bevir, M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Political Theory. Thousand Oaks & London & New Delhi & Singapore: Sage Publications.
  21. Fraser, N. 1989. "The French Derrideans. Politicizing deconstruction or deconstructing the political?" Pp. 69-92 in Unruly practices. Power, discourse and theory in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  22. Gressgård, R. 2008. "Feminist theorizes the political. The political theory of Wendy Brown." NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4: 257-263. Go to original source...
  23. Hauptmann, E. 2004. "A local history of 'the political'." Political Theory, Vol. 32, No. 1: 34-60. Go to original source...
  24. Hemmings, C. 2005. "Telling feminist stories." Feminist Theory, Vol. 6, No. 2: 115-139. Go to original source...
  25. Hirschmann, N. J., Di Stefano, C. 1996. Revisioning the political. Feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory. Boulder & Oxford: Westview Press.
  26. Honig, B. 1993. Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
  27. Kant, I. 1975. Kritika soudnosti. Praha: Odeon.
  28. Kiczková, Z. 1998. "Subjekt v pohybe." Feministický kultúrny časopis ASPEKT, č. 1: 64-75.
  29. Kobová, Ľ. 2003-2004. "Pokusy o jej život : k tematizáciám subjektu vo feministickej filozofii." Feministický kultúrny časopis ASPEKT, č. 1: 141-154.
  30. Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. 2001 (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London & New York: Verso.
  31. Lacoue-Labarthe, P., Nancy, J.-L. 1997. Retreating the political. London & New York: Routledge.
  32. Mahmood, S. 2004. Politics of piety. The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  33. Marchart, O. 2007. Post-foundational political thought. Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Go to original source...
  34. McAfee, N. 2005. "Two feminisms." Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 2: 140-149. Go to original source...
  35. McAfee, N. 2007. "Reply to Allen, Bauer, Pratt and Zerilli." [online]. Symposia on gender, race and philosophy, Vol. 3, Rancière, J. 2001. "Ten theses on politics." [online]. Theory & Event, Vol. 5, No. 3: nestránkované. Dostupnéz: <http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html>. Go to original source...
  36. Rancière, J. 2010. Dissensus. On politics and aesthetics. London & New York: Continuum. Go to original source...
  37. Rosanvallon, P. 2006. "Inaugural lecture, Collège de France." Pp. 31-58 in Democracy past and future. New York: Columbia University Press.
  38. Schmitt, C. 2007a. "Epocha neutralizací a depolitizací." Pp. 78-92 in Pojem politična. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  39. Schmitt, C. 2007b. Pojem politična. Brno & Praha: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury &Oikoymenh.
  40. Verloo, M., Schmidt-Gleim, M. 2003. "One more feminist manifesto of the political." Pp. 143-169 in Kneževič, D., Dilić, K. (eds.). Seminar Women and politics - gender in political theory. Documentation. Zagreb: Ženska infoteka.
  41. Witt, C. (ed.) 2011a. Feminist metaphysics. Explorations in the ontology of sex, gender and identity. Dordrecht & London: Springer.
  42. Witt, C.2011b. The metaphysics of gender. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  43. Yeatman, A. 1994. Postmodern revisionings of the political. New York & London: Routledge.
  44. Zerilli, L. M. G. 2009. "Toward a feminist theory of judgment." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, Vol. 34, No. 2: 295-317. Go to original source...
  45. Zerilli, L. M. G. 2007. "Response to Noëlle McAfee's, 'Two Feminisms'. Commentary on Noëlle McAfee's 'Two Feminisms'." [online]. Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy, Vol. 3, No. 3: nestránkované. [cit. 3. 5. 2010]. Dostupnéz:<http://web.mit.edu/sgrp>.
  46. Žižek, S. 2007. Nepolapitelný subjekt. Chybějící střed politické ontologie. Chomutov: L. Marek.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.