Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2011, 12 (2): 3-15

The Break-up of Unmarried cohabitations and marital divorce: The Same or different Social phenomena?

Marta Vohlídalová, Hana Maříková

Data on divorces are gathered by the Czech Statistical Office and thus widely accessible and well known, but much less information is available about the stability of unmarried cohabitations. This paper focuses on the differences between marriage and unmarried cohabitations in terms of their stability. The authors study the impact of various factors on the stability of marriages and unmarried cohabitations taking into account the different socio ‑demographic indicators. To explain this phenomenon they use various theoretical approaches emphasizing different factors of partnership instability (from socializing factors to premarital cohabitation, values, education and gender, to factors based on the theory of rational choice). The analysis identified factors that operate in the same manner within both marriages and unmarried cohabitations (e.g. children in the partnership, experience with the previous partnership break ‑ups) as well as factors that play a different role in the stability of marriages and unmarried cohabitations (e.g. education, duration of partnership, generation). The paper is based on quantitative data from the survey 'Life ‑course 2010', which included 4010 respondents. The authors used the event history approach in their analysis which enabled them to track the dependences of the variables in time.

Keywords: unmarried cohabitation, marriage, divorce, partnership instability

Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vohlídalová, Marta and Hana Maříková. 2011. "The Break-up of Unmarried cohabitations and marital divorce: The Same or different Social phenomena?" Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research 12(2):3-15.
Download citation

References

  1. Alan, J. 1989. Etapy života očima sociologie. Praha: Panora‑ ma.
  2. Axinn, W. G., Thorton, A. 1992. "The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?" Demography, Vol. 29, No. 3: 357-374. Go to original source...
  3. Bartoňová, D. 1984. "Faktická manželství v letech 1970 a 1980." Demografie, roč. 26, č. 3: 266-269. Go to original source...
  4. Beck, U. 2004. Riziková společnost. Praha: SLON.
  5. Beck, U., Beck‑Gernsheim, E. 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  6. Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  7. Becker, G., Landes, E. M. Michael, R. T. 1977. "An Econom‑ ic Analysis of Marital Instability." The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85, No. 6: 1141-1187. Go to original source...
  8. Bierzová, J. 2006. "Rozdělení domácích prací v rodinách s dětmi." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 7, č. 1: 19-25.
  9. Blackwell, D. L., Lichter, D. T. 2000. "Mate Selection among Married and Cohabiting Couples." Journal of Family Issue, Vol. 21, No. 3: 275-303. Go to original source...
  10. Brines, J., Joyner, K. 1999. "The Ties That Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage." American So‑ ciological Review, Vol. 64, No. 3: 333-355. Go to original source...
  11. Bumpass, L., Lu, H. H. 2000. "Trends in cohabitation and implication for childrens' family context in the United States." Population Studies, Vol. 54, No. 1: 29-41. Go to original source...
  12. Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A. 1989. "National estimates of cohabitation." Demography, Vol. 26, No. 4: 615-625. Go to original source...
  13. Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A. 1991. "The Role of Cohabition in Declining Rates of Marriage". Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 53, No. 4: 913-927. Go to original source...
  14. Chaloupková, J. 2006. "Dohromady, nebo každý zvlášť? Hospodaření s příjmy manželských a nesezdaných párů." Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, roč. 42, č. 5: 971-986. Go to original source...
  15. Černá, K. 2005. "Nesezdaná soužití v České repub‑ lice podle výsledků SLDB." [online]. [cit. 30. 8. 2011]. Dostupné z: <http://www.demografie.info/?cz_detail_clanku&artclID=65>.
  16. Český statistický úřad. 2010. "Vývoj obyvatelstva ČR v roce 2009." [online]. Praha: ČSÚ. [cit. 30. 8. 2011]. Dostupné z: <http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/p/4007-10>.
  17. DeMaris, A. W., MacDonald, W. 1993. "Premarital Cohab‑ itation and Marital Instability: A test of Unconvention‑ ally Hypothesis." Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 55, No. 2: 399-408. Go to original source...
  18. Dytrych, Z., Prokopec, J. Schüller, V. 1973. Rozvodové cho‑ vání a manželský nesoulad. Praha: VÚPS.
  19. Elder, G. H., Jr. 1985. "Perspectives on the Life Course." Pp. 23-49 in Elder, G. H., Jr. (ed.). Life Course Dynamics. Trajectories and Transitions, 1968-1980. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  20. Fowers, B. J. 1991. "His and her marriage: A multivari‑ ate study of gender and marital satisfaction." Sex Roles, Vol. 24, No. 3/4: 209-221. Go to original source...
  21. Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy. Sexuali‑ ty, love & eroticisms in modern societies. Cambridge: Poli‑ ty Press.
  22. Goode, W. 1956. After Divorce. Glencoe (Ill.): Free Press.
  23. Hamplová, D. 2002. "Marriage and Cohabitation: Quali‑ tative Differences in Partnership Arrangements." Soci‑ ologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, roč. 38, č. 6: 771-788. Go to original source...
  24. Hamplová, D. 2007. "Děti bez manželství nebo bez otců?" Data a výzkum - SDA info, roč. 1, č. 2: 141-154.
  25. Heinz R. W., Krüger, H. 2001. "Life Course: Innovations and Challenges for Social Research." Current Sociology, Vol. 49, No. 2: 29-45. Go to original source...
  26. Hendl, J. 2006. Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat. Praha: Portál.
  27. Hetherington, E. M., Kelly, J. 2003. For Better or For Worse: Divorce Reconsidered. New York: W. W. Norton & Compa‑ ny.
  28. Heuveline, P., J. M. Timberlake. 2004. "The Role of Cohabi‑ tation in Family Formation: The United States in Compar‑ ative Perspective." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 66, No. 5, Special Issue: 1214-1230. Go to original source...
  29. Huber, J., Spitze, G. 1980. "Considering Divorce: An Expan‑ sion of Becker's Theory of Marital Instability." American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 86, No. 1: 75-89. Go to original source...
  30. Inglehart, R. 1997. The silent revolution? Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton: Prince‑ ton University Press.
  31. Katrňák, T., Fučík, P. 2009. "Preference výběru partnera: Liší se rozvedení a svobodní ve sňatkových a partner‑ ských preferencích?" Sociológia, roč. 41, č. 5: 437-455.
  32. Kiernan, K. L. 2004. "Unmarried Cohabitation and Pa‑ renthood in Britain and Europe." Journal of Law & Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1: 33-55. Go to original source...
  33. Levinger, G. 1965. "Marital Cohesiveness nad Dissolution: An Intergrative Review." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 27, No. 1: 19-28. Go to original source...
  34. Liefbroer, A. C., Dourleijn, E. 2006. "Unmarried Cohabita‑ tion and Union Stability: Testing the Role of Diffusion Using Data from 16 European Countries." Demography, Vol. 43, No. 2: 203-221. Go to original source...
  35. Locke, H. J. 1951. Predicting Adjustment in Marriage: A Com‑ parison of Divorced and Happily Married Group. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  36. Madera, A. 2010. "Civil and Religious Law Concerning Di‑ vorce: The Condition of Women and Their Empower‑ ment." Journal of Law & Family Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2: 365-389.
  37. Martin, T. C., Bumpass, L. 1989. "Recent trends in marital disruption." Demography, Vol. 26, No. 1: 37-51. Go to original source...
  38. Martin, S. P., Parashar, S. 2006. "Women's Changing At‑ titudes Toward Divorce, 1974-2002: Evidence for an Educational Crossover." Journal of Marriage and the Fami‑ ly, Vol. 68, No. 1: 29-40. Go to original source...
  39. Možný, I. 2006. Rodina a společnost. Praha: SLON.
  40. Možný, I., Rabušic, L. 1992. "Unmarried Cohabitation in Czechoslovakia." Czechoslovak Sociological Review, Vol. 28 (August): 107-117.
  41. Nock, S. L. 1995. "A comparison of marriages and cohab‑ iting relationships". Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 16, No. 1: 53-76. Go to original source...
  42. Oppenheimer, V. K. 1988. "A Theory of Marriage Timing." American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, No. 3: 563-591. Go to original source...
  43. Oppenheimer, V. K., Nelson, L. 1997. "Men's Career Devel‑ opment and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality." Demography, Vol. 34, No. 3: 311-330. Go to original source...
  44. Pakosta, P. 2008. "Rozvodovost a vzdělání obou manželů." Demografie: Revue pro výzkum populačního vývoje, roč. 50, č. 1: 64-70.
  45. Pakosta, P., Fučík, P. 2009. "Vybrané metody analýzy pan‑ elových dat." Data a výzkum - SDA Info, roč. 3, č. 1: 77-96.
  46. Paloncyová, J. 2002. Rodinné chování mladé generace. Závěrečná zpráva z "Biografického výzkumu mladé gen‑ erace 2002". Praha: VÚPSV.
  47. Pávek, F. 1973. Rozvody očima soudce. Praha: Práce.
  48. Plzák, M. 1973. Poznání a léčba poruch manželského soužití. Praha: Avicenum.
  49. Rabušic, L. 1996. "O současném vývoji manželského a ro‑ dinného chování v České republice." Demografie, roč. 38, č. 3: 173-180.
  50. Raley, K., Bumpass, L. 2003. "The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and Trends in union stability in the Unit‑ ed States after 1980." Demographic Research, Vol. 18, No. 8: 245-260. Go to original source...
  51. Renzetti, C. M., Curran, D. J. 2003. Ženy, muži a společnost. Praha: Karolinum.
  52. Rogers, S. 2004. "Dollars, Dependency, and Divorce: Four Perspectives on the Role of Wive's Income." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 66, No. 1: 59-74. Go to original source...
  53. Scanzoni, L. D., Scanzoni, J. 1988. Men, Women and Change. New York, London: McGraw‑Hill.
  54. Seltzer, J. 2000. "Families Formed outside of Marriage." Jour‑ nal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 62, No. 4: 1247-1268. Go to original source...
  55. Shoen, R., Weinick, R. M. 1993. "Partner Choice in Mar‑ riages and Cohabitations." Journal of Marriage and Fami‑ ly, Vol. 55, No. 2: 408-414. Go to original source...
  56. Singly, F. de. 1999. Sociologie současné rodiny. Praha: Portál.
  57. Smock, P. 2000. "Cohabitation in the United States. An Ap‑ praisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications." Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 62, No. 1: 1-20. Go to original source...
  58. South, S. J., Spitze, G. 1994. "Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households." American Sociological Review, Vol. 59, No. 3: 327-347. Go to original source...
  59. Šťastná, A. 2006. "Rozvody a děti: vliv rozvodu rodičů na životní dráhu dětí." Pp. 175-190 in Hamplová, D., Šalamounová, P., Šamanová, G. (eds.) Životní cyklus. Socio‑ logické a demografické perspektivy. Praha: SOÚ AV ČR, v. v. i.
  60. Trost, J. 1981. "Cohabitation in the Nordic Countries: From Deviant Phenomenon to Social Institution." Alternative Lifestyles, Vol. 4, No. 4: 401-427. Go to original source...
  61. van de Kaa, D. J. 1987. "Europe's second demographic tran‑ sitions." Population Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 1: 1-59.
  62. Vohlídalová, M. 2007. "Participace mužů na domácích pracích a péči o děti na základě kvantitativních výzkumů." Pp. 32-61 in Maříková, H. (ed.). Trvalá nebo dočasná změna? Uspořádání gendrových rolí v rodinách s pečujícími otci. Sociologické studie 07/11. Praha: SOÚ AV ČR, v. v. i.
  63. Vohlídalová, M. 2010. "Kdo podává žádost o rozvod a jaké jsou příčiny rozpadu partnerských vztahů?" Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 11, č. 2: 48-56.
  64. Weitzman, L. J. 1985. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: The Free Press.
  65. White, L. K. 1990. "Determinants of Divorce: A Review of Research in the Eighties." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 52, No. 4: 904-912. Go to original source...
  66. White, L. K., Booth, A. 1991. "Divorce over the life course: The role of marital happiness." Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 12, No. 1: 5-21. Go to original source...
  67. Wu, Z. 1995. "The Stability of Cohabitation Relationship: The Role of Children." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 57, No. 1: 231-236. Go to original source...
  68. Zeman, K. 2003. Divorce and Marital Dissolution in the Czech Republic and in Austria - The Role of Premarital Cohabi‑ tation. (Diploma Thesis). Praha: Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.