Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2025, 26 (1): 12-34 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2025.005

‘This Feeling of Multidimensional Disease’: How Women with PCOS Narrate Their Experience with Self-Tracking Apps and Social \r\nMedia

Júlia Karpova ORCID...
University of Southern Denmark

Polycystic ovary syndrome, or PCOS, is a common condition that combines such symptoms as absent or irregular menstruation, elevated levels of ‘male’ hormones, excess facial and body hair, and problems with glucose metabolism. Receiving a PCOS diagnosis can be a disorienting experience. This article focuses on this medical condition to explore the role of different digital technologies in managing women’s health across public and private domains. Relying on seventeen semi-structured interviews with Danish women, I  suggest that self-tracking mobile applications and social media provide PCOS patients with different modes of caring and drawing boundaries between public and private. Whereas applications are designed according to the capitalist logic of paying to manage your health and fitness, so-cial media offer solidarity and mutual care. This article elucidates how patients use self-track-ing apps and social media to make sense of their unique configurations of symptoms, often without any connection to their clinical visits and communication with medical providers. I employ Annemarie Mol’s theory of the logic of choice vs the logic of care and the notion of ‘social-material networks of biosensing’ by Mette Kragh-Furbo et. al. to argue that social media partially compensate for the inadequacy of self-tracking apps for handling PCOS and offer care and solidarity through the sharing of personal stories.

Keywords: polycystic ovary syndrome, self-tracking apps, social media, the logic of choice, the logic of care, social-material networks

Received: August 11, 2024; Revised: June 4, 2025; Accepted: June 16, 2025; Prepublished online: August 26, 2025; Published: August 31, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Karpova, Júlia. 2025. "‘This Feeling of Multidimensional Disease’: How Women with PCOS Narrate Their Experience with Self-Tracking Apps and Social \r\nMedia." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 26(1):12-34.
Download citation

References

  1. Al Derham, S. 2023. The Insta-Trainer: A Study of How Instagram Is Used as a Biopedagogical Tool for Health and Wellbeing Among Young Women in Qatar. Pp. 145-165 in L. A. Balfour. FemTech: Intersectional Interventions in Women's Digital Health. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  2. Balfour, L. A. (ed.) 2023. FemTech: Intersectional Interventions in Women's Digital Health. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  3. Bardzell, J., S. Bardzell, A. Lazar, N. M. Su. 2019. (Re-)Framing Menopause Experiences for HCI and Design. Pp. 1-13 in CHI 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow: Association for Computing Machinery. Go to original source...
  4. Bardzell, S. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Pp. 1301-1310 in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '10. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Go to original source...
  5. Bennett, C. J. 2011. In Defense of Privacy: The Concept and the Regime. Surveillance & Society 8 (4): 485-496, https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i4.4184. Go to original source...
  6. Braun, V., V. Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77-101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Go to original source...
  7. Cordier, J.-F. 2014. The Expert Patient: Towards a Novel Definition. European Respiratory Journal 44 (4): 853-857, https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00027414. Go to original source...
  8. Didžiokaitė, G., P. Saukko, C. Greiffenhagen. 2018. The Mundane Experience of Everyday Calorie Trackers: Beyond the Metaphor of Quantified Self. New Media & Society 20 (4): 1470-1487, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698478. Go to original source...
  9. EF EPI. 2024. English First Proficiency English. A Ranking of 116 Countries and Regions by English Skills. Zurich: Education First. Retrieved 22/05/2025 (https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/reports/2024/ef-epi-2024-english.pdf).
  10. Epstein, D. A., N. B. Lee, J. H. Kang, E. Agapie, J. Schroeder, L. R. Pina, J. Fogarty, J. A. Kientz, S. A. Munson. 2017. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI Conference 2017: 6876-6888, https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635. Go to original source...
  11. Esmonde, K. 2020. 'There's Only so Much Data You Can Handle in Your Life': Accommodating and Resisting Self-Surveillance in Women's Running and Fitness Tracking Practices. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 12 (1): 76-90, https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1617188. Go to original source...
  12. Fellows, J. J., L. Smith. 2022. Gender, Sex, and Tech!: An Intersectional Feminist Guide. Toronto: Canadian Scholars.
  13. Fox, N. J., K. J. Ward, A. J. O'Rourke. 2005. The 'Expert Patient': Empowerment or Medical Dominance? The Case of Weight Loss, Pharmaceutical Drugs and the Internet. Social Science & Medicine 60 (6): 1299-1309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.005. Go to original source...
  14. Gammelby, A. K. 2021. Why People Sometimes Consult Facebook Rather Than Their Doctors: Devils in the Detail, Methods to the Madness. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
  15. Hachey, L. M., M. Kroger-Jarvis, T. Pavlik-Maus, R. Leach. 2020. Clinical Implications of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Adolescents. Nursing for Women's Health 24 (2): 115-126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2020.01.011. Go to original source...
  16. Homewood, S. 2018. Designing for the Changing Body: A Feminist Exploration of Self-Tracking Technologies. Pp. 1-4 in Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montreal: Association for Computing Machinery. Go to original source...
  17. Kittay, E. F. 2011. The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability. Ratio Juris 24 (1): 49-58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x. Go to original source...
  18. Kragh-Furbo, M., J. Wilkinson, M. Mort, C. Roberts, A. Mackenzie. 2018. Biosensing Networks: Sense-Making in Consumer Genomics and Ovulation Tracking. Pp. 47-69 in R. Lynch, C. Farrington (eds.). Quantified Lives and Vital Data - Exploring Health and Technology through Personal Medical Devices. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  19. Kressbach, M. 2021. Period Hacks: Menstruating in the Big Data Paradigm. Television & New Media 22 (3): 241-261, https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419886389. Go to original source...
  20. Lazar, A., N. Makoto Su, J. Bardzell, S. Bardzell. 2019. Parting the Red Sea: Sociotechnical Systems and Lived Experiences of Menopause. Pp. 1-16 in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Glasgow: Association for Computing Machinery. Go to original source...
  21. Lupton, D. 2012. M-Health and Health Promotion: The Digital Cyborg and Surveillance Society. Social Theory & Health 10 (3): 229-244, https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.6. Go to original source...
  22. Lupton, D. 2013. The Digitally Engaged Patient: Self-Monitoring and Self-Care in the Digital Health Era. Social Theory & Health 11 (3): 256-270, https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.10. Go to original source...
  23. Lupton, D. 2016. The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Sel-Tracking. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  24. Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London and New York: Routledge.
  25. Mort, M., T. Finch, C. May. 2009. Making and Unmaking Telepatients: Identity and Governance in New Health Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 34 (1): 9-33. Go to original source...
  26. Mousa, A., C. Thien Tay, H. Teede. 2023. Technical Report for the 2023 International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Melbourne: Monash University, https://doi.org/10.26180/23625288.V1. Go to original source...
  27. Murphy, M. 2015. Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices. Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 717-737, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715589136. Go to original source...
  28. Nettleton, S. 2004. The Emergence of E-Scaped Medicine. Sociology 38 (4): 661-80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504045857. Go to original source...
  29. Nicolini, D. 2007. Stretching Out and Expanding Work Practices in Time and Space: The Case of Telemedicine. Human Relations 60 (6): 889-920. Go to original source...
  30. Oudshoorn, N. 2011. Telecare Technologies and the Transformation of Healthcare. London: Palgrave MacMillan. Go to original source...
  31. Panidis, D., K. Tziomalos, G. Misichronis, E. Papadakis, G. Betsas, I. Katsikis, D. Macut. 2012. Insulin Resistance and Endocrine Characteristics of the Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Study. Human Reproduction 27 (2): 541-549, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der418. Go to original source...
  32. Pink, S., S. Sumartojo, D. Lupton, C. Heyes La Bond. 2017. Mundane Data: The Routines, Contingencies and Accomplishments of Digital Living. Big Data & Society 4 (1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717700924. Go to original source...
  33. Polzer, J., A. Sui, K. Ge, L. Cayen. 2022. Empowerment through Participatory Surveillance? Menstrual and Fertility Self-Tracking Apps as Postfeminist Biopedagogies. Pp. 163-184 in L. Smith, J. J. Fellows (eds.). Gender, Sex, and Tech: An Intersectional Feminist Guide. Toronto: Canadian Scholars.
  34. Pols, J. 2012. Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Go to original source...
  35. Robinson, F. 2015. Care Ethics, Political Theory, and the Future of Feminism. Pp 293-311 in D. Engster, M. Hamington (eds.). Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  36. Sanders, R. 2017. Self-Tracking in the Digital Era: Biopower, Patriarchy, and the New Biometric Body Projects. Body & Society 23 (1): 36-63, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16660366. Go to original source...
  37. Smith, G. J. D., B. Vonthethoff. 2017. Health by Numbers? Exploring the Practice and Experience of Datafied Health. Health Sociology Review 26 (1): 6-21, https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1196600. Go to original source...
  38. Taylor, G. A., D. McDonagh, M. J. Hansen. 2017. Improving the Pelvic Exam Experience: A Human-Centered Design Study. The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S2348-S2362, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352750. Go to original source...
  39. Tiidenberg, K., N. K. Baym. 2017. Learn It, Buy It, Work It: Intensive Pregnancy on Instagram. Social Media + Society 3 (1):1-13. Go to original source...
  40. Wada, M., J. R. Wallace. 2022. Designing Technologies for Self-Care: Describing the Lived Experiences of Individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Human Factors in Healthcare 2: 100025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100025. Go to original source...
  41. Ward, L. 2015. Caring for Ourselves? Self-Care and Neoliberalism. Pp. 45-56 in M. Barnes, T. Brannelly, L. Ward, N. Ward. Ethics of Care: Critical Advances in International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press. Go to original source...
  42. Warfield, K., C. Abidin, C. Cambre. 2020. Mediated Interfaces: The Body on Social Media. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.