Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2024, 25 (2): 13-41

The Aftermath of Minds, Hearts, and Symbols: A Multidimensional Perspective on Digital Housework

Alina Silion ORCID...
Doctoral School of Sociology, University of Bucharest

Digital housework is one of the outcomes of the spread of interactive, smart technologies in the home. This new type of work consists of domestic, personal, and professional activities that are carried out at home using technological and digital devices. This study seeks to provide a better understanding of the gender implications of the cognitive, emotional, symbolic, and outcome dimensions of digital housework. The research questions used in the study are: (1) What are cognitive, emotional, and symbolic digital housework tasks and their outcomes? (2) What gender patterns can be observed in the performance of cognitive, emotional, and symbolic digital housework? The results are drawn from a thematic analysis of 53 cultural biographies of domestic devices and indicate a distinction between cognitive, emotion, and symbolic digital housework tasks that lead to digital housework outcomes in the form of digital capital. The gender aspects of all the dimensions of digital housework are discussed along with the theoretical and practical implications of the study’s findings.

Keywords: digital housework, gender, digital capital

Received: April 30, 2024; Revised: November 12, 2024; Accepted: November 14, 2024; Published: January 9, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Silion, Alina. 2024. "The Aftermath of Minds, Hearts, and Symbols: A Multidimensional Perspective on Digital Housework." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 25(2):13-41.
Download citation

References

  1. Aagaard, L. K. 2023. When Smart Technologies Enter Household Practices: The Gendered Implications of Digital Housekeeping. Housing, Theory and Society 40 (1): 60-77. Go to original source...
  2. Beare, E. C., P. O'Raghallaigh, J. McAvoy, J Hayes. 2020. Employees' Emotional Reactions to Digitally Enabled Work Events. Journal of Decision Systems 29 (1): 226- 242. Go to original source...
  3. Bond, M. A., L. Punnett, J. L. Pyle, D. Cazeca, M. Cooperman. 2004. Gendered Work Conditions, Health, and Work Outcomes. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 9 (1): 28-45. Go to original source...
  4. Daminger, A. 2019. The Cognitive Dimension of Household Labor. American Sociological Review 84 (4): 609-633. Go to original source...
  5. Dant, T. 2001. Fruitbox/Toolbox: Biography and Objects. Auto/Biography 9 (1-2): 11-20.
  6. De Vuyst, S., K. Raeymaeckers. 2019. Is Journalism Gender E-Qual? A Study of the Gendered Accumulation and Evaluation of Digital Capital in Journalism. Digital Journalism 7 (5): 554-570. Go to original source...
  7. Elizur, D. 1994. Gender and Work Values: A Comparative Analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology 134 (2): 201-212. Go to original source...
  8. Geiger, S., E. Stendahl. 2023. Breaching, Bridging, and Bonding: Interweaving Pathways of Social-Symbolic Work in a Flanked Healthcare Movement. Journal of Management Studies 61 (6): 1-34. Go to original source...
  9. Hochschild, A. R. 1979. Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551-575. Go to original source...
  10. Horst, H., J. Sinanan. 2021. Digital Housekeeping: Living with Data. New Media & Society 23 (4): 834-852. Go to original source...
  11. Hoskins, J. 2006. Agency, Biography and Objects. Pp. 74-85 in C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands, and P. Spyer (eds.). Handbook of Material Culture. SAGE Publications Ltd. Go to original source...
  12. Karakulak, Ö., T. B. Lawrence. 2024. Social-Symbolic Work in the Construction of Social Problems: Constructing Gender Inequality in Turkish Social Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics 192 (3): 461-486. Go to original source...
  13. Kennedy, J., B. Nansen, M. Arnold, R. Wilken, M. Gibbs. 2015. Digital Housekeepers and Domestic Expertise in the Networked Home. Convergence 21 (4): 408-422. Go to original source...
  14. Kopytoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization As Process. Pp. 64-91 in A. Appadurai. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  15. Kosfeld, M., S. Neckermann. 2011. Getting More Work for Nothing? Symbolic Awards and Worker Performance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3 (3): 86-99. Go to original source...
  16. Layer, J. K., W. Karwowski, A. Furr. 2009. The Effect of Cognitive Demands and Perceived Quality of Work Life on Human Performance in Manufacturing Environments. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (2): 413-421. Go to original source...
  17. Lupton, D., S. Pink, H. Horst. 2021. Living in, with and beyond the 'Smart Home': Introduction to the Special Issue. Convergence 27 (5): 1147-1154. Go to original source...
  18. Makarius, E. E., B. Z. Larson. 2017. Changing the Perspective of Virtual Work: Building Virtual Intelligence at the Individual Level. Academy of Management Perspectives 31 (2): 159-178. Go to original source...
  19. Mehta, R. K., R. Parasuraman. 2013. Neuroergonomics: A Review of Applications to Physical and Cognitive Work. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 1-10. Go to original source...
  20. Oakley, A. 2018. The Sociology of Housework. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Go to original source...
  21. Parker, C. P., B. B. Baltes, S. A. Young, J. W. Huff, R. A. Altmann, H. A. Lacost, J. E. Roberts. 2003. Relationships between Psychological Climate Perceptions and Work Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior 24 (4): 389-416. Go to original source...
  22. Potter, P., L. Wolf, S. Boxerman, D. Grayson, J. Sledge, C. Dunagan, B. Evanoff. 2005. Understanding the Cognitive Work of Nursing in the Acute Care Environment. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration 35 (7): 327-335. Go to original source...
  23. Ragnedda, M. 2018. Conceptualizing Digital Capital. Telematics and Informatics 35 (8): 2366- 2375. Go to original source...
  24. Ragnedda, M., M. L. Ruiu. 2020. Digital Capital: A Bourdieusian Perspective on the Digital Divide. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. Go to original source...
  25. Rode, J. A., E. S. Poole. 2018. Putting the Gender Back in Digital Housekeeping. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT.: 79-90. Go to original source...
  26. Rosenbach, W. E., R. C. Dailey, C. P. Morgan. 1979. Perceptions of Job Characteristics and Affective Work Outcomes for Women and Men. Sex Roles 5 (3): 267-277. Go to original source...
  27. Schwanen, T., , M. P. Kwan, , F. Ren. 2014. The Internet and the Gender Division of Household Labour. The Geographical Journal 180 (1): 52-64. Go to original source...
  28. Shourkaei, M. M., K. M. Taylor, B. Dyck. 2024. Examining Sustainable Supply Chain Management Via a Social-Symbolic Work Lens: Lessons from Patagonia. Business Strategy and the Environment 33 (2): 1477-1496. Go to original source...
  29. Strazdins, L. M. 2000. Integrating Emotions: Multiple Role Measurement of Emotional Work. Australian Journal of Psychology 52 (1): 41-50. Go to original source...
  30. Tolmie, P., A. Crabtree, T. Rodden, C. Greenhalgh, S. Benford. 2007. Making the Home Network at Home: Digital Housekeeping. Pp. 331-350 in ECSCW 2007: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Limerick: Springer London.. Go to original source...
  31. Wang, Y., N. Haggerty. 2011. Individual Virtual Competence and Its Influence on Work Outcomes. Journal Of Management Information Systems 27 (4): 299-334. Go to original source...
  32. Whiting, R., G. Symon. 2020. Digi-Housekeeping: The Invisible Work of Flexibility. Work, Employment and Society 34 (6): 1079-1096. Go to original source...
  33. Whiting, R., H. Roby, G. Symon, P. Chamakiotis. 2015. Beyond Work and Life: Constructing New Domains in the Digital Age. EGOS 2015 COLLOQUIUM: Organizations and the Examined life: Reason, Reflexivity and Responsibility. Athens, Greece: EGOS.
  34. Zapf, D. 2002. Emotion Work and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Literature and Some Conceptual Considerations. Human Resource Management Review 12 (2): 237- 268. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.